Severing the Tentacles:
Dismantling Governance Capture
Rigged From Day One
Discover how the 77-clause reform package stops the structural abuse and restores owner rights.
Analysis & Citations
The original bylaws were systematically designed to capture condominium governance. Under the guise of a residential development, sweeping clauses were inserted to grant the developer complete control, eliminating democratic ownership rights.
The 77-clause reform package is the surgical remedy to this extraction machine. By rewriting these bylaws to align with Quintana Roo Condominium Law, we eliminate illegal unanimous voting requirements, enforce term limits, and mandate transparency.
The Takeover Playbook
Why owners must read the 77-clause reform package before the upcoming assembly, and how the developer, RETA and the initial Board failed their fiduciary duties.
Analysis & Citations
The original bylaws were intentionally withheld from owners during pre-sales, and deliberately never translated into English. Local agents and international advisory groups like RETA failed fundamentally in their fiduciary duty under SEDETUS regulations to warn owners of this structural trap.
We are introducing 77 complex legal changes. You cannot analyze this on the floor of the assembly. Please read the proposed changes on this page in advance so we can vote decisively to reclaim our building.
The Voting Trap
Understanding the assembly motions and our unequivocal recommendation to vote YES to protect your investment, property rights, and implement financial transparency.
Analysis & Citations
The assembly will require votes on distinct motions, the most critical being the formal adoption of the new bylaws. Only owners in 'Good Standing' (current on their dues to the legitimate administration) will be permitted to vote.
The Vigilance Committee strongly recommends voting YES. A NO vote, or an abstention, is a vote to maintain the current system of exploitation: leaving the building uninsured, without reserve funds, and under third-party control.
Breaking the Chains
Recap of Michael's presentation on the structural manipulation and the urgent call to vote YES at the assembly.
Analysis & Citations
The structural capture of Singular Dream was intentional. SIMCA Capital and their affiliated entities built maximum extraction into the bylaws, and our sales agents failed to warn us.
Our only way out is to vote YES on the 77-clause reform package at the upcoming assembly. To vote, owners must be current on their dues. Prepare now.
The Governance Failure
The governance failures at Singular Dream are not incidental. They are the result of a structural design created by SIMCA Capital and its affiliated entities — BB Condos, Happy Address, and the branding tool "Singular Hotels" — to retain control over condominium operations even after units were sold.
! Financial Risk to Owners
Compounding this is a financial structure that shifts all liability from commercial entities onto the owners. Currently there is: No reserve fund, No general liability coverage, No disaster insurance, and No Directors & Officers (D&O) insurance.
What followed was over a year of research, documentation, audit review, and internal legal alignment. The result is a 77-clause reform package that addresses structural abuse and restores democratic governance.
The 77-Clause Reform Package
Prepared by the Vigilance Committee (May 9, 2025). This document represents the research and analysis of the structural bylaw imbalance observed at Singular Dream.
Governance Capture Analysis: The 'Control' Protocols
The former administration, along with the building's developer and hotel operator, engineered the capture of governance through structural imbalance to gain economic advantage. By inserting 75+ modified or missing clauses, they systematically denied owners their property rights, diminishing both rental income and the long-term value of our assets.
The 'Impossible Standard'
They mandated that bylaws could only be changed with 100% owner consensus—a statistical impossibility designed to lock their contested rules in place forever.
Their intent was to 'capture governance'—permanently. They relied on procedural maneuvering and a flagrant violation of Mexican law to hold the building hostage.
Discriminatory Exclusion
Contrary to common sense and the majority foreign ownership, they mandated that only Mexican residents could serve on the board, effectively disenfranchising the true owners.